<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The DataPortability Project &#187; charm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dataportability.org/tag/charm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dataportability.org</link>
	<description> Connect. Control. Share. Remix.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:44:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook and Lumpy policy decisions</title>
		<link>http://blog.dataportability.org/2009/03/25/facebook-and-lumpy-policy-decisions/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.dataportability.org/2009/03/25/facebook-and-lumpy-policy-decisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Wolff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data portability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dataportability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dpp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eula]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tasty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dataportability.org/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rethinking your TOS/EULA is a pain in the neck. Nobody wants to divert attention, money or energy thinking about it. It seems like a serious distraction from making money and serving customers.</p> <p>Looking at the 2009 Facebook policy hubbub, it&#8217;s a big deal. It sucks up attorney fees, management, press, even engineering into a <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://blog.dataportability.org/2009/03/25/facebook-and-lumpy-policy-decisions/">Facebook and Lumpy policy decisions</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rethinking your TOS/EULA is a pain in the neck. Nobody wants to divert attention, money or energy thinking about it. It seems like a serious distraction from making money and serving customers.</p>
<p>Looking at the 2009 Facebook policy hubbub, it&#8217;s a big deal. It sucks up attorney fees, management, press, even engineering into a big, risky, bothersome pile of unhappiness.</p>
<p>So a reasonable company wouldn&#8217;t volunteer for exercises like that. Maybe, at most, an annual review. It might look like this.</p>
<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3589/3385478848_2e2376b6d8.jpg?v=0" alt="Lumpy policy revue: big bang by you." width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>Lumpy.</p>
<p>Huge piles of politics.</p>
<p>What if you smoothed it out?</p>
<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3630/3385476560_173ddaa0e3.jpg?v=0" alt="Lumpy policy revue: smoothed by you." width="500" height="102" /></p>
<p>Would that reduce the icky parts of policy review and enhance the charming parts?</p>
<p>Because policy review has its charming parts.</p>
<ul>
<li>It lets you re-engage your customers on what matters to them.</li>
<li>It helps you restate what you need from customers their language.</li>
<li>It helps turn your policy from a just-click-through-it to a loyalty building selling opportunity. Maybe even a competitive advantage.</li>
</ul>
<p>And a smoother, more continuous approach has its tasty bits too.</p>
<ul>
<li>Fewer surprises.</li>
<li>More continuity, less forgetting of why.</li>
<li>Less distraction, cost, effort.</li>
<li>Smaller changes, more easily absorbed.</li>
</ul>
<p>Smoothing might have parts like:</p>
<ul>
<li>An internal TOS/EULA lmailing list that any employee can join.</li>
<li>Annual policy summit. A little bit of briefing. A few workshops. A lot of Open Space unconference.</li>
<li>A public TOS/EULA listserve/bbs for policy advocates, concerned citizens and partners.</li>
<li>Ongoing communications (blog posts? videos?) about the state of your policy thinking, inviting participation in that thinking.</li>
</ul>
<p>Should <a title="The DataPortability Project" href="http://dataportability.org">DataPortability.org</a> help companies engage in that conversation? To move from lumpy to smooth. To avoid the icky bits. To enjoy the tasty and charming parts of policy definition. <a href="http://wiki.dataportability.org/x/mIRE">We already are &#8211; join us!</a></p>
<div id="scid:0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:35e134a5-1b2b-4918-9042-a345c11d99a7" class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent" style="padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: none; padding-top: 0px">
<p style="font-size:smaller; background:#f0f0f0; padding:.5em;">tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tags/policy">policy</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tags/review">review</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tags/charm">charm</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tags/icky">icky</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tags/tasty">tasty</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tags/tos">tos</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tags/terms">terms</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tags/eula">eula</a></p>
<p style="font-size:smaller"><em>Call me at <a href="skype:+15104554384?call">+1-510-455-4384</a>, follow <a href="http://twitter.com/skypejournal">@skypejournal</a> and <a title="twitter" rel="me" href="http://www.twitter.com/evanwolf">@Phil Wolff</a>. <a title="add Phil Wolff as a Skype friend" rel="me" href="skype:evanwolf?chat">Ask for an invitation to the Skype Journal private roundtable</a>.</em></p>
</div>
<div class="shr-publisher-211"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.dataportability.org/2009/03/25/facebook-and-lumpy-policy-decisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

